Monthly Archive

Cheap Orchard 1.10 Hosting Recommendation

Cheap Drupal 9.0 Hosting Provider Recommendation

Drupal is a free community supported framework for creating, organizing, presenting and managing a website. It powers millions of websites and applications from all over the world. Drupal makes it easy for contributors to publish to websites and easy for developers to deploy new sites as well as add features to existing ones. Most commonly referred to as a content management system, or CMS, Drupal has much more to offer. Drupal installations include a set of modules called Core Components, which provide features such as user management, menu systems, and user contributed content.

The Drupal open source community (one of the largest in the world) contributes and supports thousands of free flexible and robust modules and themes, which can be easily integrated into websites to offer powerful features such as multimedia, calendars, rating systems, and other social media tools. Drupal is also an application framework that can be used to build other aps. Drupal requires no programming skills yet the HTML code produced is accessible, cross browser compatible, and search engine friendly. Drupal is used for every type of site from personal blogs to highly trafficked enterprise level sites. 2% of all websites worldwide are built in Drupal including whitehouse.gov and many other high profile, highly visited sites.

What is Drupal Used for?

Drupal is a great choice for building all manner of websites from simple 1 page personal websites to enterprise level applications. It is particularly well suited to e-Learning systems, Community/social networking sites, and news publishing, where its powerful authoring and publishing features allow administrators to create, revise, and deploy content in a rapid and organized manner. User management, site reporting and statistics, ad management, community management, and other administrative functions utilize an intuitive and robust back-end user interface.

Are you looking for Cheap Drupal 9.0 Hosting? Finding a high quality Cheap Drupal 9.0 Hosting provider is crucial for your web application. Your Drupal 9.0 application can only run smooth if it will be hosted on a server which can provide a higher up time & plenty of computing resources. There’re thousands of web hosting providers which offer asp.net hosting, but choosing Cheap Drupal 9.0 Hosting provider is a time consuming task. To make your buying decision easy we’ve concluded 3 Best yet Cheap Drupal 9.0 Hosting providers which are reliable and offer affordable Drupal 9.0 Hosting so that every one can afford it.

Cheap Drupal 9.0 Hosting Provider Recommendation

logo-asphostportal1
discountservice-icon
logo-ukwindowshostaspnet
ASPHostPortal DiscountService.biz UKWindowsHostASP.NET
$1.00/month $2.00/month £3.00/month
Host 1 Site Host 1 Site Host 5 Sites
1 GB Disk Space 1 GB Disk Space 1 GB Disk Space
10 GB Bandwidth 10 GB Bandwidth 20 GB Bandwidth
Dedicated Application Pool Dedicated Application Pool Dedicated Application Pool
Support UTF-8 Domains Support UTF-8 Domains Support UTF-8 Domains
30-Days Money Back 30-Days Money Back 30-Days Money Back
Latest ASP.NET Latest ASP.NET Latest ASP.NET
Plesk Control Panel Plesk Control Panel Plesk Control Panel
Windows 2008/2012 Windows 2008/2012 Windows 2008/2012
SQL Server 2008/2012/2014 SQL Server 2008/2012/2014 SQL Server 2008/2012/2014
Latest MySql version Latest MySql version Latest MySql version

How to Choose Cheap Drupal 9.0 Hosting Provider Recommendation?

Reliability and Speed of Access

Not only should the web host be reliable and fast, it should guarantee its uptime (the time when it is functional). Look for a minimum uptime of 99%. In fact, even 99% is actually too low — it really should be 99.5% or higher. The host should provide some sort of refund (eg prorated refund or discount) if it falls below that figure. Note though that guarantees are often hard to enforce from your end — especially if the host denies there was any downtime. However, without that guarantee, the web host will have little incentive to ensure that its servers are running all the time.

Data Transfer (Traffic/Bandwidth)

Data transfer (sometimes loosely referred to as “traffic” or “bandwidth”) is the amount of bytes transferred from your site to visitors when they browse your site.

Don’t believe any commercial web host that advertises “unlimited bandwidth”. The host has to pay for the bandwidth, and if you consume a lot of it, they will not silently bear your costs. Many high bandwidth websites have found this out the hard way when they suddenly receive an exorbitant bill for having “exceeded” the “unlimited bandwidth”. Always look for details on how much traffic the package allows. I personally always stay clear of any host that advertises “unlimited transfer”, even if the exact amount is specified somewhere else (sometimes buried in their policy statements). Usually you will find that they redefine “unlimited” to be limited in some way.

In addition, while bandwidth provided is something you should always check, do not be unduly swayed by promises of incredibly huge amounts of bandwidth. Chances are that your website will never be able to use that amount because it will hit other limits, namely resource limits.

To give you a rough idea of the typical traffic requirements of a website, most new sites that don’t provide video or music on their site use less than 3 GB of bandwidth per month. Your traffic requirements will grow over time, as your site becomes more well-known, so you will need to also check their policy when you exceed your data transfer limit: is there a published charge per GB over the allowed bandwidth? Is the charge made according to actual usage or are you expected to pre-pay for a potential overage? It is better not to go for hosts that expect you to prepay for overages, since it is very hard to forsee when your site will exceed its bandwidth and by how much.

Disk space

For the same reason as bandwidth, watch out also for those “unlimited disk space” schemes. Many new sites (that don’t host videos or music) need less than 20 MB of web space, so even if you are provided with a host that tempts you with 100 GB (or “unlimited space”), be aware that you are unlikely to use that space, so don’t let the 100 GB space be too big a factor in your consideration when comparing with other web hosts. The hosting company is also aware of that, which is why they feel free to offer you that as a means of enticing you to host there.

Technical support

Does its technical support function 24 hours a day, 7 days a week (often abbreviated 24/7), all year around? Note that I will not accept a host which does not have staff working on weekends or public holidays. You will be surprised at how often things go wrong at the most inconvenient of times. Incidentally, just because a host advertises that it has 24/7 support does not necessarily mean that it really has that kind of support. Test them out by emailing at midnight and on Saturday nights, Sunday mornings, etc. Check out how long they take to respond. Besides speed of responses, check to see if they are technically competent. You wouldn’t want to sign up with a host that is run by a bunch of salesmen who only know how to sell and not fix problems.

Email, Autoresponders, POP3, Mail Forwarding

If you have your own site, you will probably want to have email addresses at your own domain, like [email protected], etc. Does the host allow you to set up whatever email addresses you want on your domain, so that mail can be forwarded to your current email address, or placed into a mail box on your web hosting account itself? Can you set an email address to automatically reply to the sender with a preset message (called an autoresponder)? Can you retrieve your mail with your email software?

Control Panel

This is called various names by different hosts, but essentially, they all allow you to manage different aspects of your web account yourself. Typically, and at the very minimum, it should allow you to do things like add, delete, and manage your email addresses, and change passwords for your account. I will not sign up with a host where I have to go through their technical support each time I want to change a password or add/delete an email account. Such tasks are common maintenance chores that every webmaster performs time and time again, and it would be a great hassle if you had to wait for their technical support to make the changes for you.

Web Server and Operating System

Is the type of operating system and server important?

In general, most people will want to sign up for a web host offering a Unix-based system (like Linux, FreeBSD or OpenBSD) and running the Apache web server. Most web-based software assume your website is running on such a system, and you will usually experience fewer compatibility issues with it. There are also a lot of guides available on the Internet on configuring such systems, so finding help when you need it is easier as well.

In my opinion, the only time when you will want to use a Windows server is if you’re running Windows-specific programs, like ASP scripts. But even then, you’ll probably be better off looking for a PHP-equivalent, and using a Unix-based system.

Price

I was actually hesitant to list this, but I guess it’s futile not to. However, I would caution that while price is always a factor, you should realise (“realize” in US English) that you often get what you pay for, although it’s not necessarily true that the most expensive hosts are the best.

Monthly/Quarterly/Annual Payment Plans

Most web hosts allow you to select an annual payment plan that gives you a cheaper rate than if you were to pay monthly. My current personal preference is to pay monthly with all new web hosts until I’m assured of their reliability and honesty. Paying monthly allows me to switch web hosts quickly when I find that the current host does not meet my requirements: this way, I’m not tied down to a bad web host because I have prepaid for an entire year. I do this even if the new web host guarantees that they will refund the balance if I’m dissatisfied, since at the point I sign up, I have no assurance that they will honour their guarantee. Later (usually after a couple of years), when I’m satisfied with the host, I may change payment plans to the discounted annual plans.

Resellers?

Not all hosting companies own or lease their own web servers. Some of them are actually resellers for some other hosting company. The disadvantage of using a reseller is the possibility that you are dealing with people who don’t know much about the system they are selling and who take longer to help you (they have to transmit your technical support request to the actual hosting company for it to be acted upon). However, this also depends on both the reseller and the underlying hosting company. It is thus wise not to rule out all resellers; there are a number of reliable and fast ones who are actually quite good and cheap. In fact, a number of resellers sell the same packages cheaper than their original hosting company. If you find out that a particular company is a reseller, you will need to investigate both the reseller and the real hosting company.

International

If you don’t stay in the USA, you have the option of hosting your site with some local provider. The advantage here is the ease of dealing with them (they are after all easily accessible by phone call or a visit), your familiarity with the local laws and easy recourse to those laws should it be necessary. It should be your choice if your target audience is local (eg a local fast food delivery service). On the other hand, hosting it in USA has the advantage of faster access for what is probably the largest number of your overseas visitors (particularly if you have an English-speaking audience). You also have a large number of hosting companies to choose from, and as a result, cheaper prices too.

Best Joomla 3.5 Hosting Recommendation

Cheap Git 2.27.0 Hosting Provider Recommendation

Cheap Git 2.27.0 Hosting Recommendation

Best Joomla 3.5 Hosting Recommendation

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. Git is easy to learn and has a tiny footprint with lightning fast performance. It outclasses SCM tools like Subversion, CVS, Perforce, and ClearCase with features like cheap local branching, convenient staging areas, and multiple workflows.

What’s New on Git 2.27.0?

Git 2.27 Release Notes
======================

Updates since v2.26
——————-

Backward compatibility notes

* When “git describe C” finds that commit C is pointed by a signed or
annotated tag, which records T as its tagname in the object, the
command gives T as its answer. Even if the user renames or moves
such a tag from its natural location in the “refs/tags/” hierarchy,
“git describe C” would still give T as the answer, but in such a
case “git show T^0” would no longer work as expected. There may be
nothing at “refs/tags/T” or even worse there may be a different tag
instead.

Starting from this version, “git describe” will always use the
“long” version, as if the “–long” option were given, when giving
its output based on such a misplaced tag to work around the problem.

* “git pull” issues a warning message until the pull.rebase
configuration variable is explicitly given, which some existing
users may find annoying—those who prefer not to rebase need to
set the variable to false to squelch the warning.

* The transport protocol version 2, which was promoted to the default
in Git 2.26 release, turned out to have some remaining rough edges,
so it has been demoted from the default.

UI, Workflows & Features

* A handful of options to configure SSL when talking to proxies have
been added.

* Smudge/clean conversion filters are now given more information
(e.g. the object of the tree-ish in which the blob being converted
appears, in addition to its path, which has already been given).

* When “git describe C” finds an annotated tag with tagname A to be
the best name to explain commit C, and the tag is stored in a
“wrong” place in the refs/tags hierarchy, e.g. refs/tags/B, the
command gave a warning message but used A (not B) to describe C.
If C is exactly at the tag, the describe output would be “A”, but
“git rev-parse A^0” would not be equal as “git rev-parse C^0”. The
behavior of the command has been changed to use the “long” form
i.e. A-0-gOBJECTNAME, which is correctly interpreted by rev-parse.

* “git pull” learned to warn when no pull.rebase configuration
exists, and neither –[no-]rebase nor –ff-only is given (which
would result a merge).

* “git p4” learned four new hooks and also “–no-verify” option to
bypass them (and the existing “p4-pre-submit” hook).

* “git pull” shares many options with underlying “git fetch”, but
some of them were not documented and some of those that would make
sense to pass down were not passed down.

* “git rebase” learned the “–no-gpg-sign” option to countermand
commit.gpgSign the user may have.

* The output from “git format-patch” uses RFC 2047 encoding for
non-ASCII letters on From: and Subject: headers, so that it can
directly be fed to e-mail programs. A new option has been added
to produce these headers in raw.

* “git log” learned “–show-pulls” that helps pathspec limited
history views; a merge commit that takes the whole change from a
side branch, which is normally omitted from the output, is shown
in addition to the commits that introduce real changes.

* The interactive input from various codepaths are consolidated and
any prompt possibly issued earlier are fflush()ed before we read.

* Allow “git rebase” to reapply all local commits, even if the may be
already in the upstream, without checking first.

* The ‘pack.useSparse’ configuration variable now defaults to ‘true’,
enabling an optimization that has been experimental since Git 2.21.

* “git rebase” happens to call some hooks meant for “checkout” and
“commit” by this was not a designed behaviour than historical
accident. This has been documented.

* “git merge” learns the “–autostash” option.

* “sparse-checkout” UI improvements.

* “git update-ref –stdin” learned a handful of new verbs to let the
user control ref update transactions more explicitly, which helps
as an ingredient to implement two-phase commit-style atomic
ref-updates across multiple repositories.

* “git commit-graph write” learned different ways to write out split
files.

* Introduce an extension to the commit-graph to make it efficient to
check for the paths that were modified at each commit using Bloom
filters.

* The approxidate parser learns to parse seconds with fraction and
ignore fractional part.

* The userdiff patterns for Markdown documents have been added.

* The sparse-checkout patterns have been forbidden from excluding all
paths, leaving an empty working tree, for a long time. This
limitation has been lifted.

* “git restore –staged –worktree” now defaults to take the contents
out of “HEAD”, instead of erring out.

* “git p4” learned to recover from a (broken) state where a directory
and a file are recorded at the same path in the Perforce repository
the same way as their clients do.

* “git multi-pack-index repack” has been taught to honor some
repack.* configuration variables.

Performance, Internal Implementation, Development Support etc.

* The advise API has been revamped to allow more systematic enumeration of
advice knobs in the future.

* SHA-256 transition continues.

* The code to interface with GnuPG has been refactored.

* “git stash” has kept an escape hatch to use the scripted version
for a few releases, which got stale. It has been removed.

* Enable tests that require GnuPG on Windows.

* Minor test usability improvement.

* Trace2 enhancement to allow logging of the environment variables.

* Test clean-up continues.

* Perf-test update.

* A Windows-specific test element has been made more robust against
misuse from both user’s environment and programmer’s errors.

* Various tests have been updated to work around issues found with
shell utilities that come with busybox etc.

* The config API made mixed uses of int and size_t types to represent
length of various pieces of text it parsed, which has been updated
to use the correct type (i.e. size_t) throughout.

* The “–decorate-refs” and “–decorate-refs-exclude” options “git
log” takes have learned a companion configuration variable
log.excludeDecoration that sits at the lowest priority in the
family.

* A new CI job to build and run test suite on linux with musl libc
has been added.

* Update the CI configuration to use GitHub Actions, retiring the one
based on Azure Pipelines.

* The directory traversal code had redundant recursive calls which
made its performance characteristics exponential with respect to
the depth of the tree, which was corrected.

* “git blame” learns to take advantage of the “changed-paths” Bloom
filter stored in the commit-graph file.

* The “bugreport” tool has been added.

* The object walk with object filter “–filter=tree:0” can now take
advantage of the pack bitmap when available.

* Instead of always building all branches at GitHub via Actions,
users can specify which branches to build.

* Codepaths that show progress meter have been taught to also use the
start_progress() and the stop_progress() calls as a “region” to be
traced.

* Instead of downloading Windows SDK for CI jobs for windows builds
from an external site (wingit.blob.core.windows.net), use the one
created in the windows-build job, to work around quota issues at
the external site.

Fixes since v2.26
—————–

* The real_path() convenience function can easily be misused; with a
bit of code refactoring in the callers’ side, its use has been
eliminated.
(merge 49d3c4b481 am/real-path-fix later to maint).

* Update “git p4” to work with Python 3.
(merge 6bb40ed20a yz/p4-py3 later to maint).

* The mechanism to prevent “git commit” from making an empty commit
or amending during an interrupted cherry-pick was broken during the
rewrite of “git rebase” in C, which has been corrected.
(merge 430b75f720 pw/advise-rebase-skip later to maint).

* Fix “git checkout –recurse-submodules” of a nested submodule
hierarchy.
(merge 846f34d351 pb/recurse-submodules-fix later to maint).

* The “–fork-point” mode of “git rebase” regressed when the command
was rewritten in C back in 2.20 era, which has been corrected.
(merge f08132f889 at/rebase-fork-point-regression-fix later to maint).

* The import-tars importer (in contrib/fast-import/) used to create
phony files at the top-level of the repository when the archive
contains global PAX headers, which made its own logic to detect and
omit the common leading directory ineffective, which has been
corrected.
(merge c839fcff65 js/import-tars-do-not-make-phony-files-from-pax-headers later to maint).

* Simplify the commit ancestry connectedness check in a partial clone
repository in which “promised” objects are assumed to be obtainable
lazily on-demand from promisor remote repositories.
(merge 2b98478c6f jt/connectivity-check-optim-in-partial-clone later to maint).

* The server-end of the v2 protocol to serve “git clone” and “git
fetch” was not prepared to see a delim packets at unexpected
places, which led to a crash.
(merge cacae4329f jk/harden-protocol-v2-delim-handling later to maint).

* When fed a midx that records no objects, some codepaths tried to
loop from 0 through (num_objects-1), which, due to integer
arithmetic wrapping around, made it nonsense operation with out of
bounds array accesses. The code has been corrected to reject such
an midx file.
(merge 796d61cdc0 dr/midx-avoid-int-underflow later to maint).

* Utitiles run via the run_command() API were not spawned correctly
on Cygwin, when the paths to them are given as a full path with
backslashes.
(merge 05ac8582bc ak/run-command-on-cygwin-fix later to maint).

* “git pull –rebase” tried to run a rebase even after noticing that
the pull results in a fast-forward and no rebase is needed nor
sensible, for the past few years due to a mistake nobody noticed.
(merge fbae70ddc6 en/pull-do-not-rebase-after-fast-forwarding later to maint).

* “git rebase” with the merge backend did not work well when the
rebase.abbreviateCommands configuration was set.
(merge de9f1d3ef4 ag/rebase-merge-allow-ff-under-abbrev-command later to maint).

* The logic to auto-follow tags by “git clone –single-branch” was
not careful to avoid lazy-fetching unnecessary tags, which has been
corrected.
(merge 167a575e2d jk/use-quick-lookup-in-clone-for-tag-following later to maint).

* “git rebase -i” did not leave the reflog entries correctly.
(merge 1f6965f994 en/sequencer-reflog-action later to maint).

* The more aggressive updates to remote-tracking branches we had for
the past 7 years or so were not reflected in the documentation,
which has been corrected.
(merge a44088435c pb/pull-fetch-doc later to maint).

* We’ve left the command line parsing of “git log :/a/b/” broken for
about a full year without anybody noticing, which has been
corrected.
(merge 0220461071 jc/missing-ref-store-fix later to maint).

* Misc fixes for Windows.
(merge 3efc128cd5 js/mingw-fixes later to maint).

* “git rebase” (again) learns to honor “–no-keep-empty”, which lets
the user to discard commits that are empty from the beginning (as
opposed to the ones that become empty because of rebasing). The
interactive rebase also marks commits that are empty in the todo.
(merge 50ed76148a en/rebase-no-keep-empty later to maint).

* Parsing the host part out of URL for the credential helper has been corrected.
(merge 4c5971e18a jk/credential-parsing-end-of-host-in-URL later to maint).

* Document the recommended way to abort a failing test early (e.g. by
exiting a loop), which is to say “return 1”.
(merge 7cc112dc95 jc/doc-test-leaving-early later to maint).

* The code that refreshes the last access and modified time of
on-disk packfiles and loose object files have been updated.
(merge 312cd76130 lr/freshen-file-fix later to maint).

* Validation of push certificate has been made more robust against
timing attacks.
(merge 719483e547 bc/constant-memequal later to maint).

* The custom hash function used by “git fast-import” has been
replaced with the one from hashmap.c, which gave us a nice
performance boost.
(merge d8410a816b jk/fast-import-use-hashmap later to maint).

* The “git submodule” command did not initialize a few variables it
internally uses and was affected by variable settings leaked from
the environment.
(merge 65d100c4dd lx/submodule-clear-variables later to maint).

* Raise the minimum required version of docbook-xsl package to 1.74,
as 1.74.0 was from late 2008, which is more than 10 years old, and
drop compatibility cruft from our documentation suite.
(merge 3c255ad660 ma/doc-discard-docbook-xsl-1.73 later to maint).

* “git log” learns “–[no-]mailmap” as a synonym to “–[no-]use-mailmap”
(merge 88acccda38 jc/log-no-mailmap later to maint).

* “git commit-graph write –expire-time=<timestamp>” did not use the
given timestamp correctly, which has been corrected.
(merge b09b785c78 ds/commit-graph-expiry-fix later to maint).

* Tests update to use “test-chmtime” instead of “touch -t”.
(merge e892a56845 ds/t5319-touch-fix later to maint).

* “git diff” in a partial clone learned to avoid lazy loading blob
objects in more casese when they are not needed.
(merge 95acf11a3d jt/avoid-prefetch-when-able-in-diff later to maint).

* “git push –atomic” used to show failures for refs that weren’t
even pushed, which has been corrected.
(merge dfe1b7f19c jx/atomic-push later to maint).

* Code in builtin/*, i.e. those can only be called from within
built-in subcommands, that implements bulk of a couple of
subcommands have been moved to libgit.a so that they could be used
by others.
(merge 9460fd48b5 dl/libify-a-few later to maint).

* Allowing the user to split a patch hunk while “git stash -p” does
not work well; a band-aid has been added to make this (partially)
work better.

* “git diff-tree –pretty –notes” used to hit an assertion failure,
as it forgot to initialize the notes subsystem.
(merge 5778b22b3d tb/diff-tree-with-notes later to maint).

* “git range-diff” fixes.
(merge 8d1675eb7f vd/range-diff-with-custom-pretty-format-fix later to maint).

* “git grep” did not quote a path with unusual character like other
commands (like “git diff”, “git status”) do, but did quote when run
from a subdirectory, both of which has been corrected.
(merge 45115d8490 mt/grep-cquote-path later to maint).

* GNU/Hurd is also among the ones that need the fopen() wrapper.
(merge 274a1328fb jc/gnu-hurd-lets-fread-read-dirs later to maint).

* Those fetching over protocol v2 from linux-next and other kernel
repositories are reporting that v2 often fetches way too much than
needed.
(merge 11c7f2a30b jn/demote-proto2-from-default later to maint).

* The upload-pack protocol v2 gave up too early before finding a
common ancestor, resulting in a wasteful fetch from a fork of a
project. This has been corrected to match the behaviour of v0
protocol.
(merge 2f0a093dd6 jt/v2-fetch-nego-fix later to maint).

* The build procedure did not use the libcurl library and its include
files correctly for a custom-built installation.
(merge 0573831950 jk/build-with-right-curl later to maint).

* Tighten “git mailinfo” to notice and error out when decoded result
contains NUL in it.
(merge 3919997447 dd/mailinfo-with-nul later to maint).

* Fix in-core inconsistency after fetching into a shallow repository
that broke the code to write out commit-graph.
(merge 37b9dcabfc tb/reset-shallow later to maint).

* The commit-graph code exhausted file descriptors easily when it
does not have to.
(merge c8828530b7 tb/commit-graph-fd-exhaustion-fix later to maint).

* The multi-pack-index left mmapped file descriptors open when it
does not have to.
(merge 6c7ff7cf7f ds/multi-pack-index later to maint).

* Recent update to Homebrew used by macOS folks breaks build by
moving gettext library and necessary headers.
(merge a0b3108618 ds/build-homebrew-gettext-fix later to maint).

* Incompatible options “–root” and “–fork-point” of “git rebase”
have been marked and documented as being incompatible.
(merge a35413c378 en/rebase-root-and-fork-point-are-incompatible later to maint).

* Error and verbose trace messages from “git push” did not redact
credential material embedded in URLs.
(merge d192fa5006 js/anonymise-push-url-in-errors later to maint).

* Update the parser used for credential.<URL>.<variable>
configuration, to handle <URL>s with ‘/’ in them correctly.
(merge b44d0118ac bc/wildcard-credential later to maint).

* Recent updates broke parsing of “credential.<url>.<key>” where
<url> is not a full URL (e.g. [credential “https://”] helper = …)
stopped working, which has been corrected.
(merge 9a121b0d22 js/partial-urlmatch-2.17 later to maint).
(merge cd93e6c029 js/partial-urlmatch later to maint).

* Some of the files commit-graph subsystem keeps on disk did not
correctly honor the core.sharedRepository settings and some were
left read-write.

* In error messages that “git switch” mentions its option to create a
new branch, “-b/-B” options were shown, where “-c/-C” options
should be, which has been corrected.
(merge 7c16ef7577 dl/switch-c-option-in-error-message later to maint).

* With the recent tightening of the code that is used to parse
various parts of a URL for use in the credential subsystem, a
hand-edited credential-store file causes the credential helper to
die, which is a bit too harsh to the users. Demote the error
behaviour to just ignore and keep using well-formed lines instead.
(merge c03859a665 cb/credential-store-ignore-bogus-lines later to maint).

* The samples in the credential documentation has been updated to
make it clear that we depict what would appear in the .git/config
file, by adding appropriate quotes as needed..
(merge 177681a07e jk/credential-sample-update later to maint).

* “git branch” and other “for-each-ref” variants accepted multiple
–sort=<key> options in the increasing order of precedence, but it
had a few breakages around “–ignore-case” handling, and tie-breaking
with the refname, which have been fixed.
(merge 7c5045fc18 jk/for-each-ref-multi-key-sort-fix later to maint).

* The coding guideline for shell scripts instructed to refer to a
variable with dollar-sign inside arithmetic expansion to work
around a bug in old versions of dash, which is a thing of the past.
Now we are not forbidden from writing $((var+1)).
(merge 32b5fe7f0e jk/arith-expansion-coding-guidelines later to maint).

* The <stdlib.h> header on NetBSD brings in its own definition of
hmac() function (eek), which conflicts with our own and unrelated
function with the same name. Our function has been renamed to work
around the issue.
(merge 3013118eb8 cb/avoid-colliding-with-netbsd-hmac later to maint).

* The basic test did not honor $TEST_SHELL_PATH setting, which has
been corrected.
(merge 0555e4af58 cb/t0000-use-the-configured-shell later to maint).

* Minor in-code comments and documentation updates around credential
API.
(merge 1aed817f99 cb/credential-doc-fixes later to maint).

* Teach “am”, “commit”, “merge” and “rebase”, when they are run with
the “–quiet” option, to pass “–quiet” down to “gc –auto”.
(merge 7c3e9e8cfb jc/auto-gc-quiet later to maint).

* The code to skip unmerged paths in the index when sparse checkout
is in use would have made out-of-bound access of the in-core index
when the last path was unmerged, which has been corrected.

* Serving a “git fetch” client over “git://” and “ssh://” protocols
using the on-wire protocol version 2 was buggy on the server end
when the client needs to make a follow-up request to
e.g. auto-follow tags.
(merge 08450ef791 cc/upload-pack-v2-fetch-fix later to maint).

* “git bisect replay” had trouble with input files when they used
CRLF line ending, which has been corrected.
(merge 6c722cbe5a cw/bisect-replay-with-dos later to maint).

* “rebase -i” segfaulted when rearranging a sequence that has a
fix-up that applies another fix-up (which may or may not be a
fix-up of yet another step).
(merge 02471e7e20 js/rebase-autosquash-double-fixup-fix later to maint).

* “git fsck” ensures that the paths recorded in tree objects are
sorted and without duplicates, but it failed to notice a case where
a blob is followed by entries that sort before a tree with the same
name. This has been corrected.
(merge 9068cfb20f rs/fsck-duplicate-names-in-trees later to maint).

* Code clean-up by removing a compatibility implementation of a
function we no longer use.
(merge 84b0115f0d cb/no-more-gmtime later to maint).

* When a binary file gets modified and renamed on both sides of history
to different locations, both files would be written to the working
tree but both would have the contents from “ours”. This has been
corrected so that the path from each side gets their original content.

* Fix for a copy-and-paste error introduced during 2.20 era.
(merge e68a5272b1 ds/multi-pack-verify later to maint).

* Update an unconditional use of “grep -a” with a perl script in a test.
(merge 1eb7371236 dd/t5703-grep-a-fix later to maint).

* Other code cleanup, docfix, build fix, etc.
(merge 564956f358 jc/maintain-doc later to maint).
(merge 7422b2a0a1 sg/commit-slab-clarify-peek later to maint).
(merge 9c688735f6 rs/doc-passthru-fetch-options later to maint).
(merge 757c2ba3e2 en/oidset-uninclude-hashmap later to maint).
(merge 8312aa7d74 jc/config-tar later to maint).
(merge d00a5bdd50 ss/submodule-foreach-cb later to maint).
(merge 64d1022e14 ar/test-style-fixes later to maint).
(merge 4a465443a6 ds/doc-clone-filter later to maint).
(merge bb2dbe301b jk/t3419-drop-expensive-tests later to maint).
(merge d3507cc712 js/test-junit-finalization-fix later to maint).
(merge 2149b6748f bc/faq later to maint).
(merge 12dc0879f1 jk/test-cleanup later to maint).
(merge 344420bf0f pb/rebase-doc-typofix later to maint).
(merge 7cd54d37dc dl/wrapper-fix-indentation later to maint).
(merge 78725ebda9 jc/allow-strlen-substitution-in-shell-scripts later to maint).
(merge 2ecfcdecc6 jm/gitweb-fastcgi-utf8 later to maint).
(merge 0740d0a5d3 jk/oid-array-cleanups later to maint).
(merge a1aba0c95c js/t0007-typofix later to maint).
(merge 76ba7fa225 ma/config-doc-fix later to maint).
(merge 826f0c0df2 js/subtree-doc-update-to-asciidoctor-2 later to maint).
(merge 88eaf361e0 eb/mboxrd-doc later to maint).
(merge 051cc54941 tm/zsh-complete-switch-restore later to maint).
(merge 39102cf4fe ms/doc-revision-illustration-fix later to maint).
(merge 4d9378bfad eb/gitweb-more-trailers later to maint).
(merge bdccbf7047 mt/doc-worktree-ref later to maint).
(merge ce9baf234f dl/push-recurse-submodules-fix later to maint).
(merge 4153274052 bc/doc-credential-helper-value later to maint).
(merge 5c7bb0146e jc/codingstyle-compare-with-null later to maint).

Branching and Merging

The Git feature that really makes it stand apart from nearly every other SCM out there is its branching model.

Git allows and encourages you to have multiple local branches that can be entirely independent of each other. The creation, merging, and deletion of those lines of development takes seconds.

This means that you can do things like:

  • Frictionless Context Switching. Create a branch to try out an idea, commit a few times, switch back to where you branched from, apply a patch, switch back to where you are experimenting, and merge it in.
  • Role-Based Codelines. Have a branch that always contains only what goes to production, another that you merge work into for testing, and several smaller ones for day to day work.
  • Feature Based Workflow. Create new branches for each new feature you’re working on so you can seamlessly switch back and forth between them, then delete each branch when that feature gets merged into your main line.
  • Disposable Experimentation. Create a branch to experiment in, realize it’s not going to work, and just delete it – abandoning the work—with nobody else ever seeing it (even if you’ve pushed other branches in the meantime).

Small and Fast

Git is fast. With Git, nearly all operations are performed locally, giving it a huge speed advantage on centralized systems that constantly have to communicate with a server somewhere.

Git was built to work on the Linux kernel, meaning that it has had to effectively handle large repositories from day one. Git is written in C, reducing the overhead of runtimes associated with higher-level languages. Speed and performance has been a primary design goal of the Git from the start.

Benchmarks

Let’s see how common operations stack up against Subversion, a common centralized version control system that is similar to CVS or Perforce. Smaller is faster.

Distributed

One of the nicest features of any Distributed SCM, Git included, is that it’s distributed. This means that instead of doing a “checkout” of the current tip of the source code, you do a “clone” of the entire repository.

Multiple Backups

This means that even if you’re using a centralized workflow, every user essentially has a full backup of the main server. Each of these copies could be pushed up to replace the main server in the event of a crash or corruption. In effect, there is no single point of failure with Git unless there is only a single copy of the repository.

Any Workflow

Because of Git’s distributed nature and superb branching system, an almost endless number of workflows can be implemented with relative ease.

Subversion-Style Workflow

A centralized workflow is very common, especially from people transitioning from a centralized system. Git will not allow you to push if someone has pushed since the last time you fetched, so a centralized model where all developers push to the same server works just fine.

Data Assurance

The data model that Git uses ensures the cryptographic integrity of every bit of your project. Every file and commit is checksummed and retrieved by its checksum when checked back out. It’s impossible to get anything out of Git other than the exact bits you put in.

Staging Area

Unlike the other systems, Git has something called the “staging area” or “index”. This is an intermediate area where commits can be formatted and reviewed before completing the commit.

One thing that sets Git apart from other tools is that it’s possible to quickly stage some of your files and commit them without committing all of the other modified files in your working directory or having to list them on the command line during the commit.

Free and Open Source

Git is released under the GNU General Public License version 2.0, which is an open source license. The Git project chose to use GPLv2 to guarantee your freedom to share and change free software—to make sure the software is free for all its users.

Are you looking for Cheap Git 2.27.0 Hosting? Finding a high quality Cheap Git 2.27.0 Hosting provider is crucial for your web application. Your Git 2.27.0 application can only run smooth if it will be hosted on a server which can provide a higher up time & plenty of computing resources. There’re thousands of web hosting providers which offer asp.net hosting, but choosing Cheap Git 2.27.0 Hosting provider is a time consuming task. To make your buying decision easy we’ve concluded 3 Best yet Cheap Git 2.27.0 Hosting providers which are reliable and offer affordable Git 2.27.0 Hosting so that every one can afford it.

Cheap Git 2.27.0 Hosting Recommendation

 

logo-asphostportal1
discountservice-icon
logo-ukwindowshostaspnet
ASPHostPortal DiscountService.biz UKWindowsHostASP.NET
$1.00/month $2.00/month £3.00/month
Host 1 Site Host 1 Site Host 5 Sites
1 GB Disk Space 1 GB Disk Space 1 GB Disk Space
10 GB Bandwidth 10 GB Bandwidth 20 GB Bandwidth
Dedicated Application Pool Dedicated Application Pool Dedicated Application Pool
Support UTF-8 Domains Support UTF-8 Domains Support UTF-8 Domains
30-Days Money Back 30-Days Money Back 30-Days Money Back
Latest ASP.NET Latest ASP.NET Latest ASP.NET
Plesk Control Panel Plesk Control Panel Plesk Control Panel
Windows 2008/2012 Windows 2008/2012 Windows 2008/2012
SQL Server 2008/2012/2014 SQL Server 2008/2012/2014 SQL Server 2008/2012/2014
Latest MySql version Latest MySql version Latest MySql version

How to Choose Cheap Git 2.27.0 Hosting Recommendation?

Reliability and Speed of Access

Not only should the web host be reliable and fast, it should guarantee its uptime (the time when it is functional). Look for a minimum uptime of 99%. In fact, even 99% is actually too low — it really should be 99.5% or higher. The host should provide some sort of refund (eg prorated refund or discount) if it falls below that figure. Note though that guarantees are often hard to enforce from your end — especially if the host denies there was any downtime. However, without that guarantee, the web host will have little incentive to ensure that its servers are running all the time.

Data Transfer (Traffic/Bandwidth)

Data transfer (sometimes loosely referred to as “traffic” or “bandwidth”) is the amount of bytes transferred from your site to visitors when they browse your site.

Don’t believe any commercial web host that advertises “unlimited bandwidth”. The host has to pay for the bandwidth, and if you consume a lot of it, they will not silently bear your costs. Many high bandwidth websites have found this out the hard way when they suddenly receive an exorbitant bill for having “exceeded” the “unlimited bandwidth”. Always look for details on how much traffic the package allows. I personally always stay clear of any host that advertises “unlimited transfer”, even if the exact amount is specified somewhere else (sometimes buried in their policy statements). Usually you will find that they redefine “unlimited” to be limited in some way.

In addition, while bandwidth provided is something you should always check, do not be unduly swayed by promises of incredibly huge amounts of bandwidth. Chances are that your website will never be able to use that amount because it will hit other limits, namely resource limits.

To give you a rough idea of the typical traffic requirements of a website, most new sites that don’t provide video or music on their site use less than 3 GB of bandwidth per month. Your traffic requirements will grow over time, as your site becomes more well-known, so you will need to also check their policy when you exceed your data transfer limit: is there a published charge per GB over the allowed bandwidth? Is the charge made according to actual usage or are you expected to pre-pay for a potential overage? It is better not to go for hosts that expect you to prepay for overages, since it is very hard to forsee when your site will exceed its bandwidth and by how much.

Disk space

For the same reason as bandwidth, watch out also for those “unlimited disk space” schemes. Many new sites (that don’t host videos or music) need less than 20 MB of web space, so even if you are provided with a host that tempts you with 100 GB (or “unlimited space”), be aware that you are unlikely to use that space, so don’t let the 100 GB space be too big a factor in your consideration when comparing with other web hosts. The hosting company is also aware of that, which is why they feel free to offer you that as a means of enticing you to host there.

Technical support

Does its technical support function 24 hours a day, 7 days a week (often abbreviated 24/7), all year around? Note that I will not accept a host which does not have staff working on weekends or public holidays. You will be surprised at how often things go wrong at the most inconvenient of times. Incidentally, just because a host advertises that it has 24/7 support does not necessarily mean that it really has that kind of support. Test them out by emailing at midnight and on Saturday nights, Sunday mornings, etc. Check out how long they take to respond. Besides speed of responses, check to see if they are technically competent. You wouldn’t want to sign up with a host that is run by a bunch of salesmen who only know how to sell and not fix problems.

Email, Autoresponders, POP3, Mail Forwarding

If you have your own site, you will probably want to have email addresses at your own domain, like [email protected], etc. Does the host allow you to set up whatever email addresses you want on your domain, so that mail can be forwarded to your current email address, or placed into a mail box on your web hosting account itself? Can you set an email address to automatically reply to the sender with a preset message (called an autoresponder)? Can you retrieve your mail with your email software?

Control Panel

This is called various names by different hosts, but essentially, they all allow you to manage different aspects of your web account yourself. Typically, and at the very minimum, it should allow you to do things like add, delete, and manage your email addresses, and change passwords for your account. I will not sign up with a host where I have to go through their technical support each time I want to change a password or add/delete an email account. Such tasks are common maintenance chores that every webmaster performs time and time again, and it would be a great hassle if you had to wait for their technical support to make the changes for you.

Web Server and Operating System

Is the type of operating system and server important?

In general, most people will want to sign up for a web host offering a Unix-based system (like Linux, FreeBSD or OpenBSD) and running the Apache web server. Most web-based software assume your website is running on such a system, and you will usually experience fewer compatibility issues with it. There are also a lot of guides available on the Internet on configuring such systems, so finding help when you need it is easier as well.

In my opinion, the only time when you will want to use a Windows server is if you’re running Windows-specific programs, like ASP scripts. But even then, you’ll probably be better off looking for a PHP-equivalent, and using a Unix-based system.

Price

I was actually hesitant to list this, but I guess it’s futile not to. However, I would caution that while price is always a factor, you should realise (“realize” in US English) that you often get what you pay for, although it’s not necessarily true that the most expensive hosts are the best.

Monthly/Quarterly/Annual Payment Plans

Most web hosts allow you to select an annual payment plan that gives you a cheaper rate than if you were to pay monthly. My current personal preference is to pay monthly with all new web hosts until I’m assured of their reliability and honesty. Paying monthly allows me to switch web hosts quickly when I find that the current host does not meet my requirements: this way, I’m not tied down to a bad web host because I have prepaid for an entire year. I do this even if the new web host guarantees that they will refund the balance if I’m dissatisfied, since at the point I sign up, I have no assurance that they will honour their guarantee. Later (usually after a couple of years), when I’m satisfied with the host, I may change payment plans to the discounted annual plans.

Resellers?

Not all hosting companies own or lease their own web servers. Some of them are actually resellers for some other hosting company. The disadvantage of using a reseller is the possibility that you are dealing with people who don’t know much about the system they are selling and who take longer to help you (they have to transmit your technical support request to the actual hosting company for it to be acted upon). However, this also depends on both the reseller and the underlying hosting company. It is thus wise not to rule out all resellers; there are a number of reliable and fast ones who are actually quite good and cheap. In fact, a number of resellers sell the same packages cheaper than their original hosting company. If you find out that a particular company is a reseller, you will need to investigate both the reseller and the real hosting company.

International

If you don’t stay in the USA, you have the option of hosting your site with some local provider. The advantage here is the ease of dealing with them (they are after all easily accessible by phone call or a visit), your familiarity with the local laws and easy recourse to those laws should it be necessary. It should be your choice if your target audience is local (eg a local fast food delivery service). On the other hand, hosting it in USA has the advantage of faster access for what is probably the largest number of your overseas visitors (particularly if you have an English-speaking audience). You also have a large number of hosting companies to choose from, and as a result, cheaper prices too.

Easy Way to Manually Backup Your WordPress Website

If you’re new to WordPress you’re probably unfamiliar with the process of backing up a website.

Even if you’re a bit overwhelmed at the task or confused as to what to do, backups are one of the most crucial aspects of owning and/or managing a website, so be sure to pay attention in this area.

In the following blog post, we discuss the process of manually backing up a WordPress website. This process entails backing up the MySQL database as well as the site files.

There are a number of automated backup options – plugins, tools, and solutions – available, but beyond setting up an automated backup process, it’s important to know how to manually backup your website should the need arise.

As mentioned above, manually backing up a website will require you to log into the server and export the two core components (site files and database) from two different locations.

The site files will be located within the File Manager console of your server, while your database can be accessed through phpMyAdmin.

For the below guide, we’ll be using cPanel as the server reference. If in the event your server is set up using a different platform, look for the same or similarly worded areas – File Manager and phpMyAdmin – in your user dashboard.

Before you begin, a good practice for this process is to create a folder on your computer and rename it as either your or your client’s business name and follow the name with the date of the backup. Within this folder, create two subfolders called “Site Files” and “Database”.

How to Manually Export Your WordPress Website’s Database

To begin, log in to the admin interface of your website’s cPanel using either your chosen login details or those shared with you by your client.

WordPress uses a MySQL database system to operate. Web developers can interact with the website’s database through the phpMyAdmin console. The database stores a number of indexes, users, tables and more, each which contain various systems and processes relating to the functioning of the website.

To export the database, click on the Databases dropdown and select phpMyAdmin. Once selected, the phpMyAdmin console will open in a new browser tab.

Once you’re inside phpMyAdmin, look on the left-hand side panel and select the database of the website. If the server itself is hosting a number of websites, you’ll see a list of available, linked websites. Once you’ve selected the correct database, the right-hand panel will display all of the tables associated with the site.

Now, click on the tab that says “Export”. Note, in other servers it may be required to scroll down to the bottom of the table list and click a checkbox that says ‘Select All’ before clicking on the “Export” tab.

Once you’re in the Export console, you’ll be met with a few input options:

  1. Select Quick as the Export method
  2. Select SQL as the Format option
  3. Click Go

A file should automatically start downloading and will save to either your Downloads folder or similar. Once the download has completed you should see a file with the suffix .sql saved on your computer. Move this file to the subfolder named “Database”.

For whatever reason, should the database not automatically download, it may display directly within in your phpMyAdmin console. If this happens, simply copy everything in the display box and paste it into a new IDE file (Sublime, Brackets or your computer’s default TextEdit). Once pasted, save the file as db.sql, companyname.sql or similar, and move it to the relevant folder.

Great!

You’ve successfully exported your website’s database. The next step is to export the site files.

How to Manually Export Your WordPress Website’s Site Files

When exporting your website’s site files, the most common route is simply to use CPanel itself. In some cases, users may need to export the site files by using FTP.

Both of these methods are explained below.

Exporting Your WordPress Website’s Site Files Using CPanel

Once you’ve logged into CPanel, navigate to the dashboard and select the File Manager option.

In the File Manager, navigate to the right-hand column and select the folder named ‘public_html’. Note, you may have to move around between folders. Once you’ve located public_html, click on the folder name (not double clicking on it as this will open the folder) and click Compress.

A pop up will appear. Select .zip Archive then click Compress File(s).

Once the files have been compressed, click on the ‘public_html.zip’ folder and click Download.

Once the download is complete, remember to delete the .zip file as it’ll take up unnecessary space on your server. To do this, click on the ‘public_html.zip’ folder and click Delete.

At this point, locate the .zip file and move it to the Site Files folder.

Great! You’ve successfully exported your website’s site files!

If you are unable to export the site files directly from the CPanel, you’ll need to use an FTP client to connect to your website’s server.

What is FTP?

FTP stands for File Transfer Protocol. This useful piece of software allows you to make a connection between a live website’s server and your computer.

With an FTP client, you’re able to access the live server, export and save the site files, and/or move the website’s files onto your desktop, and vice versa. A bit of a confusing interface at first contact, using the FTP client will become second nature with practice.

Two of the leading FTP clients are FileZilla and Cyberduck. Simply visit either of the respective websites, download the latest version of the software and install it on your device.

Once your FTP client has been downloaded and is up and running, you can connect to your website’s server in a few easy steps. For this demonstration, we’ll be using FileZilla.

How To Use FTP To Connect To Your Website’s Server

To connect to your website’s server, you’ll need the FTP login credentials. To locate these details, log into cPanel, navigate to Files and click on FTP Accounts.

If you can’t find the correct login details, contact your hosting service provider.

Once you open up FileZilla, you’ll see two panels:

  • The left-hand side (the local site) is your computer
  • The right-hand side (the remote site) is the server you will be connecting to.

Now, navigate to File > Site Manager.

Next, a window will pop up. Click on ‘New Site’ and give the website a name.

In the right-hand panel, you’ll be asked to specify a number of details:

  • Host is usually the domain name of the website in question
  • Select Normal as the Logon Type
  • Enter the relevant details for the Username and Password

When you’ve entered all of the above, click Connect. FileZilla will save all of these settings so you won’t have to re-enter all of the information the next time you connect to the server.

Once you connect to the server, look under the “Remote Site” panel and you’ll see a list of your website’s files and folders. Click on the dropdown arrow and scroll until you see a folder named “public_html”. This folder is also called the root folder and it is the entire collection of your website’s site files.

If you’ve previously set up local sites or created a child theme, you’ll see that some of these files and folders look quite familiar.

This folder, the public_html folder, is what we’ll export for the backup.

How to Manually Export Your WordPress Website’s Site Files

Remember the folder on your desktop called “Website Name” with the subfolders “Site Files” and “Database”? Well, we’ll be transferring the contents of the public_html folder into the Site Files folder

In the FTP client, head to the left-hand panel and sort through the Local site (your computer) until you find the backup folder.

Next, go to the right-hand side panel and locate the public_html folder of the website you’d like to back up.

Now, click and hold on the public_html folder on the right-hand panel and drag it across to the Site Files folder in the left-hand panel.

Let the transfer/export process run until complete (how long the process takes depends on your internet speed).

Finally, head on over to the “Website Name + Backup Date” folder. You’ll see that the entire public_html folder is there, as well as the SQL database in the Database folder.

Now that you’ve backed up the website’s database and it’s site files, you can rest easy knowing that you’ve safeguarded yourself and your client’s website.

Best ASP.NET Hosting – ASPHostPortal VS WinHost

Cheap and Reliable nopCommerce 4.30 Hosting Recommendation

Cheap and Reliable nopCommerce 4.30 Hosting Recommendation

Best ASP.NET Hosting – ASPHostPortal VS WinHost

nopCommerce is an open source ecommerce software that contains both a catalog frontend and an administration tool backend. nopCommerce is a fully customizable shopping cart. It’s stable and highly usable. From downloads to documentation, nopCommerce.com offers a comprehensive base of information, resources, and support to the nopCommerce community.

nopCommerce is open-source ecommerce solution. It’s stable and highly usable. nopCommerce is an open source ecommerce solution that is ASP.NET (MVC) based with a MS SQL 2008 (or higher) backend database. It has been downloaded more than 1.5 million times! Our easy-to-use shopping cart solution is uniquely suited for merchants that have outgrown existing systems, and may be hosted with your current web host or our hosting partners. It has everything you need to get started in selling physical and digital goods over the internet. nopCommerce offers unprecedented flexibility and control.

What is New in nopCommerce 4.30?

Highlight features:

  • Significant performance enhancement. We revised nopCommerce caching system and moved away from Entity Framework. And now we can say that this new upcoming release will be the fastest version of nopCommerce ever!
  • Upgrade to .NET Core 3.1
  • MySQL support
  • Facebook Pixel

Are you looking for Cheap and Reliable nopCommerce 4.30 Hosting? Finding a high quality Cheap and Reliable nopCommerce 4.30 Hosting provider is crucial for your web application. Your nopCommerce 4.30 application can only run smooth if it will be hosted on a server which can provide a higher up time & plenty of computing resources. There’re thousands of web hosting providers which offer asp.net hosting, but choosing Cheap and Reliable nopCommerce 4.30 Hosting provider is a time consuming task. To make your buying decision easy we’ve concluded 3 Best yet Cheap nopCommerce 4.30 Hosting providers which are reliable and offer affordable nopCommerce 4.30 Hosting so that every one can afford it.

Cheap and Reliable nopCommerce 4.30 Hosting Recommendation

 

logo-asphostportal1
discountservice-icon
logo-ukwindowshostaspnet
ASPHostPortal DiscountService.biz UKWindowsHostASP.NET
$1.00/month $2.00/month £3.00/month
Host 1 Site Host 1 Site Host 5 Sites
1 GB Disk Space 1 GB Disk Space 1 GB Disk Space
10 GB Bandwidth 10 GB Bandwidth 20 GB Bandwidth
Dedicated Application Pool Dedicated Application Pool Dedicated Application Pool
Support UTF-8 Domains Support UTF-8 Domains Support UTF-8 Domains
30-Days Money Back 30-Days Money Back 30-Days Money Back
Latest ASP.NET Latest ASP.NET Latest ASP.NET
Plesk Control Panel Plesk Control Panel Plesk Control Panel
Windows 2008/2012 Windows 2008/2012 Windows 2008/2012
SQL Server 2008/2012/2014 SQL Server 2008/2012/2014 SQL Server 2008/2012/2014
Latest MySql version Latest MySql version Latest MySql version

How to Choose Cheap and Reliable nopCommerce 4.30 Hosting Recommendation

Reliability and Speed of Access

Not only should the web host be reliable and fast, it should guarantee its uptime (the time when it is functional). Look for a minimum uptime of 99%. In fact, even 99% is actually too low — it really should be 99.5% or higher. The host should provide some sort of refund (eg prorated refund or discount) if it falls below that figure. Note though that guarantees are often hard to enforce from your end — especially if the host denies there was any downtime. However, without that guarantee, the web host will have little incentive to ensure that its servers are running all the time.

Data Transfer (Traffic/Bandwidth)

Data transfer (sometimes loosely referred to as “traffic” or “bandwidth”) is the amount of bytes transferred from your site to visitors when they browse your site.

Don’t believe any commercial web host that advertises “unlimited bandwidth”. The host has to pay for the bandwidth, and if you consume a lot of it, they will not silently bear your costs. Many high bandwidth websites have found this out the hard way when they suddenly receive an exorbitant bill for having “exceeded” the “unlimited bandwidth”. Always look for details on how much traffic the package allows. I personally always stay clear of any host that advertises “unlimited transfer”, even if the exact amount is specified somewhere else (sometimes buried in their policy statements). Usually you will find that they redefine “unlimited” to be limited in some way.

In addition, while bandwidth provided is something you should always check, do not be unduly swayed by promises of incredibly huge amounts of bandwidth. Chances are that your website will never be able to use that amount because it will hit other limits, namely resource limits.

To give you a rough idea of the typical traffic requirements of a website, most new sites that don’t provide video or music on their site use less than 3 GB of bandwidth per month. Your traffic requirements will grow over time, as your site becomes more well-known, so you will need to also check their policy when you exceed your data transfer limit: is there a published charge per GB over the allowed bandwidth? Is the charge made according to actual usage or are you expected to pre-pay for a potential overage? It is better not to go for hosts that expect you to prepay for overages, since it is very hard to forsee when your site will exceed its bandwidth and by how much.

Disk space

For the same reason as bandwidth, watch out also for those “unlimited disk space” schemes. Many new sites (that don’t host videos or music) need less than 20 MB of web space, so even if you are provided with a host that tempts you with 100 GB (or “unlimited space”), be aware that you are unlikely to use that space, so don’t let the 100 GB space be too big a factor in your consideration when comparing with other web hosts. The hosting company is also aware of that, which is why they feel free to offer you that as a means of enticing you to host there.

Technical support

Does its technical support function 24 hours a day, 7 days a week (often abbreviated 24/7), all year around? Note that I will not accept a host which does not have staff working on weekends or public holidays. You will be surprised at how often things go wrong at the most inconvenient of times. Incidentally, just because a host advertises that it has 24/7 support does not necessarily mean that it really has that kind of support. Test them out by emailing at midnight and on Saturday nights, Sunday mornings, etc. Check out how long they take to respond. Besides speed of responses, check to see if they are technically competent. You wouldn’t want to sign up with a host that is run by a bunch of salesmen who only know how to sell and not fix problems.

Email, Autoresponders, POP3, Mail Forwarding

If you have your own site, you will probably want to have email addresses at your own domain, like [email protected], etc. Does the host allow you to set up whatever email addresses you want on your domain, so that mail can be forwarded to your current email address, or placed into a mail box on your web hosting account itself? Can you set an email address to automatically reply to the sender with a preset message (called an autoresponder)? Can you retrieve your mail with your email software?

Control Panel

This is called various names by different hosts, but essentially, they all allow you to manage different aspects of your web account yourself. Typically, and at the very minimum, it should allow you to do things like add, delete, and manage your email addresses, and change passwords for your account. I will not sign up with a host where I have to go through their technical support each time I want to change a password or add/delete an email account. Such tasks are common maintenance chores that every webmaster performs time and time again, and it would be a great hassle if you had to wait for their technical support to make the changes for you.

Web Server and Operating System

Is the type of operating system and server important?

In general, most people will want to sign up for a web host offering a Unix-based system (like Linux, FreeBSD or OpenBSD) and running the Apache web server. Most web-based software assume your website is running on such a system, and you will usually experience fewer compatibility issues with it. There are also a lot of guides available on the Internet on configuring such systems, so finding help when you need it is easier as well.

In my opinion, the only time when you will want to use a Windows server is if you’re running Windows-specific programs, like ASP scripts. But even then, you’ll probably be better off looking for a PHP-equivalent, and using a Unix-based system.

Price

I was actually hesitant to list this, but I guess it’s futile not to. However, I would caution that while price is always a factor, you should realise (“realize” in US English) that you often get what you pay for, although it’s not necessarily true that the most expensive hosts are the best.

Monthly/Quarterly/Annual Payment Plans

Most web hosts allow you to select an annual payment plan that gives you a cheaper rate than if you were to pay monthly. My current personal preference is to pay monthly with all new web hosts until I’m assured of their reliability and honesty. Paying monthly allows me to switch web hosts quickly when I find that the current host does not meet my requirements: this way, I’m not tied down to a bad web host because I have prepaid for an entire year. I do this even if the new web host guarantees that they will refund the balance if I’m dissatisfied, since at the point I sign up, I have no assurance that they will honour their guarantee. Later (usually after a couple of years), when I’m satisfied with the host, I may change payment plans to the discounted annual plans.

Resellers?

Not all hosting companies own or lease their own web servers. Some of them are actually resellers for some other hosting company. The disadvantage of using a reseller is the possibility that you are dealing with people who don’t know much about the system they are selling and who take longer to help you (they have to transmit your technical support request to the actual hosting company for it to be acted upon). However, this also depends on both the reseller and the underlying hosting company. It is thus wise not to rule out all resellers; there are a number of reliable and fast ones who are actually quite good and cheap. In fact, a number of resellers sell the same packages cheaper than their original hosting company. If you find out that a particular company is a reseller, you will need to investigate both the reseller and the real hosting company.

International

If you don’t stay in the USA, you have the option of hosting your site with some local provider. The advantage here is the ease of dealing with them (they are after all easily accessible by phone call or a visit), your familiarity with the local laws and easy recourse to those laws should it be necessary. It should be your choice if your target audience is local (eg a local fast food delivery service). On the other hand, hosting it in USA has the advantage of faster access for what is probably the largest number of your overseas visitors (particularly if you have an English-speaking audience). You also have a large number of hosting companies to choose from, and as a result, cheaper prices too.

Cheap and Reliable WordPress 4.4.2 Hosting

Cheap Node.js v14.4.0 Hosting – Dedicated Cloud Server

Cheap Node.js v14.4.0 Hosting – Dedicated Cloud Server

Cheap and Reliable WordPress 4.4.2 Hosting

Node.js is a runtime system for creating (mostly) server-side applications. It’s best known as a popular means for JavaScript coders to build real-time Web APIs.

But Node.js is not a JavaScript framework; indeed, several authors have written excellent frameworks specifically for Node.js, including Express.js, Restify.js, and Hapi.js. So what exactly is this phenomenon finding its way into Web applications, operating systems wrappers, microcontrollers, and robots?

At it’s core, Node.js is a stripped-down, highly customizable server engine — a proto-server, if you will — because out of the box it doesn’t do anything until you set it up. This proto-server processes in a loop, ready to accept and respond to requests. Any of those requests themselves may initiate other requests to some other part of the system, such as to read a file off of disk or to send a signal to spin a motor on a robot arm. That loop, known as the event loop, is the “runtime” part.

Node.js ships with workhorse connectors and libraries such as those relating to HTTP, SSL, compression, filesystem access, and raw TCP and UDP. JavaScript, already tuned for a Web browser’s event loop environment for GUI and network events, is a great language for wiring up these connectors. You can snap connectors onto the event loop almost as easily as you can snap Lego parts together. Doing so lets you create a simple, dynamic Web server in just a few lines of JavaScript.

What’s New in Node.js v14.4.0?

Notable changes

This is a security release.

Vulnerabilities fixed:

  • CVE-2020-8172: TLS session reuse can lead to host certificate verification bypass (High).
  • CVE-2020-11080: HTTP/2 Large Settings Frame DoS (Low).
  • CVE-2020-8174napi_get_value_string_*() allows various kinds of memory corruption (High).

As of Node.js 14 there is no longer this warning when using ESM in Node.js. However, the ESM implementation in Node.js remains experimental. As per our stability index: “The feature is not subject to Semantic Versioning rules. Non-backward compatible changes or removal may occur in any future release.” Users should be cautious when using the feature in production environments.

Are you looking for Cheap Node.js v14.4.0 Hosting? Finding a high quality Cheap Node.js v14.4.0 Hosting provider is crucial for your web application. Your Node.js v14.4.0 application can only run smooth if it will be hosted on a server which can provide a higher up time & plenty of computing resources. There’re thousands of web hosting providers which offer asp.net hosting, but choosing Cheap Node.js v14.4.0 Hosting provider is a time consuming task. To make your buying decision easy we’ve concluded 3 Best yet Cheap Node.js v14.4.0 Hosting providers which are reliable and offer affordable Node.js v14.4.0 Hosting so that every one can afford it.

If you know JavaScript, Node.js is a gentle on-ramp to asynchronous computing for the Web. And it just so happens that Node.js is suited to solve Web problems exactly of this type: integration and glue challenges, with cascading calls to API after API.

Where does Node.js not work so well? It’s not totally appropriate in places where a single-threaded calculation is going to be the holdup, like some kinds of successive approximation or classification. In those instances, it’s more efficient for Node.js to drop the request to an independent library that’s dedicated to the task, where it can be distributed across hundreds or thousands of processors.

Node.js is maturing quickly and is being deployed in more and more mission-critical and revenue-critical systems, such as eCommerce Black Friday infrastructures. It’s easy to get started with Node.js, and yet Node.js is deep enough to handle modern Web complexities. If you’re building your next generation Web site — especially APIs for mobile and Web integration — or if you are creating something new that depends on underlying services itself, Node.js is a runtime system that could very well work for you.

Cheap Node.js® v14.4.0 Hosting – Dedicated Cloud Server

 

logo-asphostportal1
discountservice-icon
logo-ukwindowshostaspnet
ASPHostPortal DiscountService.biz UKWindowsHostASP.NET
$1.00/month $2.00/month £3.00/month
Host 1 Site Host 1 Site Host 5 Sites
1 GB Disk Space 1 GB Disk Space 1 GB Disk Space
10 GB Bandwidth 10 GB Bandwidth 20 GB Bandwidth
Dedicated Application Pool Dedicated Application Pool Dedicated Application Pool
Support UTF-8 Domains Support UTF-8 Domains Support UTF-8 Domains
30-Days Money Back 30-Days Money Back 30-Days Money Back
Latest ASP.NET Latest ASP.NET Latest ASP.NET
Plesk Control Panel Plesk Control Panel Plesk Control Panel
Windows 2008/2012 Windows 2008/2012 Windows 2008/2012
SQL Server 2008/2012/2014 SQL Server 2008/2012/2014 SQL Server 2008/2012/2014
Latest MySql version Latest MySql version Latest MySql version

How to Choose Cheap Node.js® v14.4.0 Hosting – Dedicated Cloud Server?

Reliability and Speed of Access

Not only should the web host be reliable and fast, it should guarantee its uptime (the time when it is functional). Look for a minimum uptime of 99%. In fact, even 99% is actually too low — it really should be 99.5% or higher. The host should provide some sort of refund (eg prorated refund or discount) if it falls below that figure. Note though that guarantees are often hard to enforce from your end — especially if the host denies there was any downtime. However, without that guarantee, the web host will have little incentive to ensure that its servers are running all the time.

Data Transfer (Traffic/Bandwidth)

Data transfer (sometimes loosely referred to as “traffic” or “bandwidth”) is the amount of bytes transferred from your site to visitors when they browse your site.

Don’t believe any commercial web host that advertises “unlimited bandwidth”. The host has to pay for the bandwidth, and if you consume a lot of it, they will not silently bear your costs. Many high bandwidth websites have found this out the hard way when they suddenly receive an exorbitant bill for having “exceeded” the “unlimited bandwidth”. Always look for details on how much traffic the package allows. I personally always stay clear of any host that advertises “unlimited transfer”, even if the exact amount is specified somewhere else (sometimes buried in their policy statements). Usually you will find that they redefine “unlimited” to be limited in some way.

In addition, while bandwidth provided is something you should always check, do not be unduly swayed by promises of incredibly huge amounts of bandwidth. Chances are that your website will never be able to use that amount because it will hit other limits, namely resource limits.

To give you a rough idea of the typical traffic requirements of a website, most new sites that don’t provide video or music on their site use less than 3 GB of bandwidth per month. Your traffic requirements will grow over time, as your site becomes more well-known, so you will need to also check their policy when you exceed your data transfer limit: is there a published charge per GB over the allowed bandwidth? Is the charge made according to actual usage or are you expected to pre-pay for a potential overage? It is better not to go for hosts that expect you to prepay for overages, since it is very hard to forsee when your site will exceed its bandwidth and by how much.

Disk space

For the same reason as bandwidth, watch out also for those “unlimited disk space” schemes. Many new sites (that don’t host videos or music) need less than 20 MB of web space, so even if you are provided with a host that tempts you with 100 GB (or “unlimited space”), be aware that you are unlikely to use that space, so don’t let the 100 GB space be too big a factor in your consideration when comparing with other web hosts. The hosting company is also aware of that, which is why they feel free to offer you that as a means of enticing you to host there.

Technical support

Does its technical support function 24 hours a day, 7 days a week (often abbreviated 24/7), all year around? Note that I will not accept a host which does not have staff working on weekends or public holidays. You will be surprised at how often things go wrong at the most inconvenient of times. Incidentally, just because a host advertises that it has 24/7 support does not necessarily mean that it really has that kind of support. Test them out by emailing at midnight and on Saturday nights, Sunday mornings, etc. Check out how long they take to respond. Besides speed of responses, check to see if they are technically competent. You wouldn’t want to sign up with a host that is run by a bunch of salesmen who only know how to sell and not fix problems.

Email, Autoresponders, POP3, Mail Forwarding

If you have your own site, you will probably want to have email addresses at your own domain, like [email protected], etc. Does the host allow you to set up whatever email addresses you want on your domain, so that mail can be forwarded to your current email address, or placed into a mail box on your web hosting account itself? Can you set an email address to automatically reply to the sender with a preset message (called an autoresponder)? Can you retrieve your mail with your email software?

Control Panel

This is called various names by different hosts, but essentially, they all allow you to manage different aspects of your web account yourself. Typically, and at the very minimum, it should allow you to do things like add, delete, and manage your email addresses, and change passwords for your account. I will not sign up with a host where I have to go through their technical support each time I want to change a password or add/delete an email account. Such tasks are common maintenance chores that every webmaster performs time and time again, and it would be a great hassle if you had to wait for their technical support to make the changes for you.

Web Server and Operating System

Is the type of operating system and server important?

In general, most people will want to sign up for a web host offering a Unix-based system (like Linux, FreeBSD or OpenBSD) and running the Apache web server. Most web-based software assume your website is running on such a system, and you will usually experience fewer compatibility issues with it. There are also a lot of guides available on the Internet on configuring such systems, so finding help when you need it is easier as well.

In my opinion, the only time when you will want to use a Windows server is if you’re running Windows-specific programs, like ASP scripts. But even then, you’ll probably be better off looking for a PHP-equivalent, and using a Unix-based system.

Price

I was actually hesitant to list this, but I guess it’s futile not to. However, I would caution that while price is always a factor, you should realise (“realize” in US English) that you often get what you pay for, although it’s not necessarily true that the most expensive hosts are the best.

Monthly/Quarterly/Annual Payment Plans

Most web hosts allow you to select an annual payment plan that gives you a cheaper rate than if you were to pay monthly. My current personal preference is to pay monthly with all new web hosts until I’m assured of their reliability and honesty. Paying monthly allows me to switch web hosts quickly when I find that the current host does not meet my requirements: this way, I’m not tied down to a bad web host because I have prepaid for an entire year. I do this even if the new web host guarantees that they will refund the balance if I’m dissatisfied, since at the point I sign up, I have no assurance that they will honour their guarantee. Later (usually after a couple of years), when I’m satisfied with the host, I may change payment plans to the discounted annual plans.

Resellers?

Not all hosting companies own or lease their own web servers. Some of them are actually resellers for some other hosting company. The disadvantage of using a reseller is the possibility that you are dealing with people who don’t know much about the system they are selling and who take longer to help you (they have to transmit your technical support request to the actual hosting company for it to be acted upon). However, this also depends on both the reseller and the underlying hosting company. It is thus wise not to rule out all resellers; there are a number of reliable and fast ones who are actually quite good and cheap. In fact, a number of resellers sell the same packages cheaper than their original hosting company. If you find out that a particular company is a reseller, you will need to investigate both the reseller and the real hosting company.

International

If you don’t stay in the USA, you have the option of hosting your site with some local provider. The advantage here is the ease of dealing with them (they are after all easily accessible by phone call or a visit), your familiarity with the local laws and easy recourse to those laws should it be necessary. It should be your choice if your target audience is local (eg a local fast food delivery service). On the other hand, hosting it in USA has the advantage of faster access for what is probably the largest number of your overseas visitors (particularly if you have an English-speaking audience). You also have a large number of hosting companies to choose from, and as a result, cheaper prices too.

Cheap Orchard 1.10 Hosting Recommendation

Everything You Need to Know About Pageless Web Design

Pageless Web design is a design technique that concentrates everything on a single page. All the information on the site is presented on that page and therefore it is also known as single page design. Some of its best features include guided narrative that evolves like a story, use of responsive elements and an intuitive scrolling experience for the users.

Pageless design can be the future of web design. Quite often it is used to upgrade an old site and make it look like new. It is perhaps the best design technique available today. Most of the web designers for hire have already opted for pageless web design.

What Makes Pageless Web Design Suitable for All Websites?

It uses stories as its most important feature to inspire and captivate the users and motivate them to action. Stories tend to have a long-lasting impression in the minds of the users. When it is used in the design, it is presented in proper order so that one thing connects to another. It is not a set of information displayed haphazardly on the screen. The information that requires the highest priority appears first followed by something that falls next in the list of priorities. The user or the visitor cannot help but make a natural, uncontrolled progress to the end of the site. He/She is able to absorb the message that the site is trying to convey, and it has a powerful impact on the person. The action is seamless and whole.

Pageless design is highly responsive. It uses responsive elements on the screen, such as fluid grids, flexible frameworks, and so on. It works seamlessly across all devices. Pageless web design is extremely mobile-friendly because it does not question the importance of the mobile user; instead, it goes straight into creating websites that can be marketed effectively to such users. It ensures that the site generates as much traffic from mobile phone users as it does from desktop users.

The effective use of intuitive scrolling is another factor that makes pageless web design a satisfying experience for users. It creates websites that have a linear scrolling pattern and viewers have to scroll down to view all the elements on the page. These days, with so many popular social media platforms such as Facebook users, have adopted more naturally to scrolling in a page. Therefore, when they find the same features on a website, they tend to connect more with the experience. Moreover, they do not have to click on different elements to view them. Clicking is not only time consuming, but it also involves a conscious decision on their part. And they can avoid this by scrolling. Scrolling is also faster and can provide more information at once than a single click can. The page-load is less likely to slow down. The best thing about it is that it works perfectly on mobile phones as well.

Pageless web design goes beyond traditional design techniques. It integrates within itself certain “bubble wrap” techniques to captivate the users. Some of these techniques include creative animation, chiming buttons, boxes flipping on the screen, and so on. These interactive elements on the screen are fun and engaging for the users, and they are bound to create a positive impact on them. They help to create an emotional connect with the users.

Should You Opt for Pageless Web Design?

Perhaps, the most crucial reason why you should opt for pageless design is that it leads to higher conversion rates. Due to the simplicity of the design, its storytelling aspect and its high level of interactions it allows users to focus and ultimately generate new leads. They are less likely to be confused or mislead. With such a design, it is easier to promote a brand and its products, to improve its sales and to grow its online community. Automatically, it reduces the chances of bounce rates and encourages people to share the website with others.

Choosing a pageless design for your site can be the best option for your business. Unlike traditional websites that required a large sum of money to be customised, pageless design is highly cost-effective. It enables you to create the best user experience across all devices at an affordable price. Getting the best results for your site is at your fingertips. All you need to do is make the most of it.

Best Joomla 3.5 Hosting Recommendation

Cheap Sitefinity 13.0 Hosting Recommendation

Cheap Sitefinity 13.0 Hosting Recommendation

Best Joomla 3.5 Hosting Recommendation Sitefinity 13.0 has been released. Now, with Sitefinity 13.0 you can personalize each individual piece of content and image to create a near endless number of customized experiences on a single page, easier and faster than ever before. Some organizations want to keep their software behind their firewall, but for those that want to leverage great cloud platforms like Microsoft Azure and Amazon Web Services, Sitefinity 13.0 makes it easier than ever.

Sitefinity is a content management system designed by the Telerik corporation. Because it was built with the singular purpose of being a CMS for eCommerce retailers, it features powerful retail-improvement tools that many other content management tools lack. While, according to W3Tech.com, Sitefinity is only used by 0.2% of known websites at present, the user-base it has developed is made up of la creme de la creme of international commerce.

What is New in Sitefinity 13.0?

Sitefinity 13 enables organizations with sharp focus on leveraging technology to improve existing experiences (B2C, B2B, B2E), differentiate from competitors and accelerate digital transformation.

The latest release delivers peak performance, optimal security and access to a host of new capabilities that positively impact productivity and operational efficiency across marketing and IT teams.

Consitent Content Management Experience

Deliver enhanced productivity and flexibility with powerful image and taxonomy management tools

Persistent Personalization and Insights

Prove the ROI of your marketing initiatives with  ML-driven analytics, persistent personalization and reporting

Developer Productivity Enhancements

Deliver omnichannel content while  maintaining control over the presentation layer with enhanced Headless API support

.NET Core Support

Tap into a powerful .NET Core developer framework and the New Page Editor

Are you looking for Cheap Sitefinity 13.0 Hosting? Finding a high quality Cheap Sitefinity 13.0 Hosting provider is crucial for your web application. Your Sitefinity 13.0 application can only run smooth if it will be hosted on a server which can provide a higher up time & plenty of computing resources. There’re thousands of web hosting providers which offer asp.net hosting, but choosing Cheap Sitefinity 13.0 Hosting provider is a time consuming task. To make your buying decision easy we’ve concluded 3 Best yet Cheap Sitefinity 13.0 Hosting providers which are reliable and offer affordable Sitefinity 13.0 Hosting so that every one can afford it.

Cheap Sitefinity 13.0 Hosting Recommendation

 

logo-asphostportal1
discountservice-icon
logo-ukwindowshostaspnet
ASPHostPortal DiscountService.biz UKWindowsHostASP.NET
$1.00/month $2.00/month £3.00/month
Host 1 Site Host 1 Site Host 5 Sites
1 GB Disk Space 1 GB Disk Space 1 GB Disk Space
10 GB Bandwidth 10 GB Bandwidth 20 GB Bandwidth
Dedicated Application Pool Dedicated Application Pool Dedicated Application Pool
Support UTF-8 Domains Support UTF-8 Domains Support UTF-8 Domains
30-Days Money Back 30-Days Money Back 30-Days Money Back
Latest ASP.NET Latest ASP.NET Latest ASP.NET
Plesk Control Panel Plesk Control Panel Plesk Control Panel
Windows 2008/2012 Windows 2008/2012 Windows 2008/2012
SQL Server 2008/2012/2014 SQL Server 2008/2012/2014 SQL Server 2008/2012/2014
Latest MySql version Latest MySql version Latest MySql version

How to Choose Cheap Sitefinity 13.0 Hosting Recommendation

Reliability and Speed of Access

Not only should the web host be reliable and fast, it should guarantee its uptime (the time when it is functional). Look for a minimum uptime of 99%. In fact, even 99% is actually too low — it really should be 99.5% or higher. The host should provide some sort of refund (eg prorated refund or discount) if it falls below that figure. Note though that guarantees are often hard to enforce from your end — especially if the host denies there was any downtime. However, without that guarantee, the web host will have little incentive to ensure that its servers are running all the time.

Data Transfer (Traffic/Bandwidth)

Data transfer (sometimes loosely referred to as “traffic” or “bandwidth”) is the amount of bytes transferred from your site to visitors when they browse your site.

Don’t believe any commercial web host that advertises “unlimited bandwidth”. The host has to pay for the bandwidth, and if you consume a lot of it, they will not silently bear your costs. Many high bandwidth websites have found this out the hard way when they suddenly receive an exorbitant bill for having “exceeded” the “unlimited bandwidth”. Always look for details on how much traffic the package allows. I personally always stay clear of any host that advertises “unlimited transfer”, even if the exact amount is specified somewhere else (sometimes buried in their policy statements). Usually you will find that they redefine “unlimited” to be limited in some way.

In addition, while bandwidth provided is something you should always check, do not be unduly swayed by promises of incredibly huge amounts of bandwidth. Chances are that your website will never be able to use that amount because it will hit other limits, namely resource limits.

To give you a rough idea of the typical traffic requirements of a website, most new sites that don’t provide video or music on their site use less than 3 GB of bandwidth per month. Your traffic requirements will grow over time, as your site becomes more well-known, so you will need to also check their policy when you exceed your data transfer limit: is there a published charge per GB over the allowed bandwidth? Is the charge made according to actual usage or are you expected to pre-pay for a potential overage? It is better not to go for hosts that expect you to prepay for overages, since it is very hard to forsee when your site will exceed its bandwidth and by how much.

Disk space

For the same reason as bandwidth, watch out also for those “unlimited disk space” schemes. Many new sites (that don’t host videos or music) need less than 20 MB of web space, so even if you are provided with a host that tempts you with 100 GB (or “unlimited space”), be aware that you are unlikely to use that space, so don’t let the 100 GB space be too big a factor in your consideration when comparing with other web hosts. The hosting company is also aware of that, which is why they feel free to offer you that as a means of enticing you to host there.

Technical support

Does its technical support function 24 hours a day, 7 days a week (often abbreviated 24/7), all year around? Note that I will not accept a host which does not have staff working on weekends or public holidays. You will be surprised at how often things go wrong at the most inconvenient of times. Incidentally, just because a host advertises that it has 24/7 support does not necessarily mean that it really has that kind of support. Test them out by emailing at midnight and on Saturday nights, Sunday mornings, etc. Check out how long they take to respond. Besides speed of responses, check to see if they are technically competent. You wouldn’t want to sign up with a host that is run by a bunch of salesmen who only know how to sell and not fix problems.

Email, Autoresponders, POP3, Mail Forwarding

If you have your own site, you will probably want to have email addresses at your own domain, like [email protected], etc. Does the host allow you to set up whatever email addresses you want on your domain, so that mail can be forwarded to your current email address, or placed into a mail box on your web hosting account itself? Can you set an email address to automatically reply to the sender with a preset message (called an autoresponder)? Can you retrieve your mail with your email software?

Control Panel

This is called various names by different hosts, but essentially, they all allow you to manage different aspects of your web account yourself. Typically, and at the very minimum, it should allow you to do things like add, delete, and manage your email addresses, and change passwords for your account. I will not sign up with a host where I have to go through their technical support each time I want to change a password or add/delete an email account. Such tasks are common maintenance chores that every webmaster performs time and time again, and it would be a great hassle if you had to wait for their technical support to make the changes for you.

Web Server and Operating System

Is the type of operating system and server important?

In general, most people will want to sign up for a web host offering a Unix-based system (like Linux, FreeBSD or OpenBSD) and running the Apache web server. Most web-based software assume your website is running on such a system, and you will usually experience fewer compatibility issues with it. There are also a lot of guides available on the Internet on configuring such systems, so finding help when you need it is easier as well.

In my opinion, the only time when you will want to use a Windows server is if you’re running Windows-specific programs, like ASP scripts. But even then, you’ll probably be better off looking for a PHP-equivalent, and using a Unix-based system.

Price

I was actually hesitant to list this, but I guess it’s futile not to. However, I would caution that while price is always a factor, you should realise (“realize” in US English) that you often get what you pay for, although it’s not necessarily true that the most expensive hosts are the best.

Monthly/Quarterly/Annual Payment Plans

Most web hosts allow you to select an annual payment plan that gives you a cheaper rate than if you were to pay monthly. My current personal preference is to pay monthly with all new web hosts until I’m assured of their reliability and honesty. Paying monthly allows me to switch web hosts quickly when I find that the current host does not meet my requirements: this way, I’m not tied down to a bad web host because I have prepaid for an entire year. I do this even if the new web host guarantees that they will refund the balance if I’m dissatisfied, since at the point I sign up, I have no assurance that they will honour their guarantee. Later (usually after a couple of years), when I’m satisfied with the host, I may change payment plans to the discounted annual plans.

Resellers?

Not all hosting companies own or lease their own web servers. Some of them are actually resellers for some other hosting company. The disadvantage of using a reseller is the possibility that you are dealing with people who don’t know much about the system they are selling and who take longer to help you (they have to transmit your technical support request to the actual hosting company for it to be acted upon). However, this also depends on both the reseller and the underlying hosting company. It is thus wise not to rule out all resellers; there are a number of reliable and fast ones who are actually quite good and cheap. In fact, a number of resellers sell the same packages cheaper than their original hosting company. If you find out that a particular company is a reseller, you will need to investigate both the reseller and the real hosting company.

International

If you don’t stay in the USA, you have the option of hosting your site with some local provider. The advantage here is the ease of dealing with them (they are after all easily accessible by phone call or a visit), your familiarity with the local laws and easy recourse to those laws should it be necessary. It should be your choice if your target audience is local (eg a local fast food delivery service). On the other hand, hosting it in USA has the advantage of faster access for what is probably the largest number of your overseas visitors (particularly if you have an English-speaking audience). You also have a large number of hosting companies to choose from, and as a result, cheaper prices too.

error: Content is protected !!