Windows ASP.NET Hosting Comparison - ASPHostPortal VS Accu Web Hosting VS EasyHost1
0 0
Read Time:14 Minute, 14 Second

Microsoft has renamed its next-generation web application framework ASP.NET Core 6.0.2, previously known as ASP.NET 5. In addition, the forthcoming Entity Framework 7, a database framework, will now be called ASP.NET Core 6.0.2.

Entity Framework Core 6.0.2 (EF Core) is Microsoft’s reboot of Entity Framework for the new “mobile first, cloud first” world. According to the roadmap, EF Core will become the official version at some point in the future when the team feels that they have a critical mass of important ORM features implemented. Entity Framework is Microsoft’s recommended data access technology for new applications.

.Net Framework is 17 years old and there are millions of apps built on it, by using every chunk of the functionality that Microsoft has ever incorporated. The weight of all of these apps makes .Net Framework incredibly heavy. Hence, the scope to innovate the .Net Framework is diminishing. Further, .Net Core has turned up a few years ago. At the time, it appeared as a younger brother of the .Net framework to attract Linux and Mac users. The recent announcement about the arrival of .Net Core 3 promises to bridge the gap with the latest version of .Net Framework, empowering WPF, Windows Form and Entity Framework 6. Alongside these two versions of .Net – .Net Framework and .Net Core, Microsoft made a huge announcement about the release of .Net 5 – the future of .Net. The announcement added that there would be .Net 5 that is Opensource and Cross-platform, which will replace .Net Framework, .Net Core and Xamarin with a single unified platform called .Net 5 Framework. .Net 5 - A Unified Platform As shown above, .Net 5 will be powered with the best features of the .Net Framework, .Net Core, Mono, and Xamarin to provide APIs, libraries, and run-time to create apps for Web, Windows, Mobile & IoT devices. The main goal of .Net 5 is to empower unified .Net Client Application projects to create deliverables for various platforms including Windows, UNIX, Linux, Legacy Windows, iOS, Driod, HTML5, and Macintosh. With the announcement of .Net 5, we realized that Microsoft is skipping .Net 4 to avoid mix-up with the .Net Framework versions. Then the .Net 5 will be accompanied by the .Net versions like .Net 6.0.2, .Net 7.0 & .Net 8.0. This will not happen overnight. Microsoft .Net team has announced the timeline for these versions as shown below:.Net Schedule Source: Microsoft

.Net 5 Moves ahead with .Net Core

.Net 5 will offer everything that you would expect from the .Net core while making it suitable for Mobile and IoT platform development. With these new updates, developers will no longer need to choose between .Net Core, .Net Framework and Mono, based on which platform they’re developing their applications. As the first step in that direction, the .Net 5 ensures to incorporate the best of .Net core functionalities:
  • Cross-platform implementation with any device
  • Supports all key platform features for .Net core, Xamarin, .Net Framework
  • Open Source & Community-Oriented
  • Fast, Scalable, and high performance
  • Support with future updates to Visual Studio Code, Visual Studio 2019, Command Line Interface and Visual Studio for Mac.
  • Support for platform-specific features like Windows Forms, & WPF on Windows
  • Side-by-side installation
  • Smarter Deployment & packages
  • Small Project Files
Besides these features, .Net 5 promises the three new major supports for developers:.Net 5 Feature For Developers These updates would ensure a single unified .Net framework and runtime for everything, including Mac, Web, Mobile, IoT, Gaming, Data Science, Machine Learning and Cloud.

Other Vital Features to Highlight

As Microsoft resolves the kinks on the latest version of .Net, the .Net 5 will feature new .Net APIs, desktop development, runtime capabilities, language features and many more.

1. Desktop Development with .Net 5

Microsoft is fetching Windows Desktop Packs to support desktop apps, which works only on Windows. .Net 5 will come up with all key desktop development functionalities and libraries. Xamarin, WPF, Windows Forms and UWP (Universal Windows Platform) are the four key desktop platforms. The porting of Windows desktop app into .Net doesn’t change the .Net Core architecture, but adds some additional benefits including Core Runtime & API Performance enhancement, and deployment flexibility. .Net 5 also supports some major sub-framework for desktop development like Entity Framework, GDI+, LINQ, and ADO.Net.

2. Mobile Development with .Net

.Net 5 will continue to build cross-platform mobile apps for Android, iOS, tvOS, macOS, and watchOS platforms using Xamarin. Xamarin is supported by the Mono runtime and it offers a set of programming languages, developers’ tools and libraries. Xamarin uses XAML as the major UI programming language and C# as the backend language.

3. Cloud Development with .NET 5

Azure app development will be one among the major functionalities of .Net 5. With the release of the latest version of .Net, developers will continue to develop software with Azure. Azure Cloud development encompasses a mix of tools and frameworks, including Web API, ASP.Net, Serverless computing, Azure databases, Docker containers, microservices, DevOps and more.

4. Game Development with .Net 5

.Net 5 and Visual Studio 2019 will support Unity, a vital part of .Net gaming to develop games for mobile, Xbox and other gaming platforms.

5. Runtime and Language with .Net 5

.Net 5 will provide the developers with the choice of runtimes between CoreCLR and Mono. CoreCLR is the .Net core runtime used for Windows desktop, IOT, machine learning, and Cloud applications. Mono is a well-known Cross-platform .Net implementation, an open source alternative to .Net frameworks. Both Mono and CoreCLR include many similarities and some valuable unique capabilities. Additionally, .Net 5 will come up with AoT(Ahead-of-Time) and JIT (Just-in-Time) compilation models. JIT has proven its enhanced performance for server/desktop workloads as well as the development environment. On the other hand, AoT possesses a small footprint, fast startup, and lower memory usage.

Are you looking for Best ASP.NET Core 6.0.2 Hosting? Finding a high quality Best ASP.NET Core 6.0.2 Hosting provider is crucial for your web application. Your ASP.NET Core 6.0.2 application can only run smooth if it will be hosted on a server which can provide a higher up time & plenty of computing resources. There’re thousands of web hosting providers which offer hosting, but choosing Best ASP.NET Core 6.0.2 Hosting provider is a time consuming task. To make your buying decision easy we’ve concluded 3 Best yet Cheap ASP.NET Core 6.0.2 Hosting providers which are reliable and offer affordable ASP.NET Core 6.0.2 Hosting so that every one can afford it.

Best ASP.NET Core 6.0.2 / EF Core 6.0.2 Hosting Recommendation


$1.0.10/month €6.0.20/month £6.0.20/month
Host 1 Site Host Unlimited Site Host 5 Sites
1 GB Disk Space Unlimited Disk Space 1 GB Disk Space
10 GB Bandwidth Unlimited Bandwidth 20 GB Bandwidth
Dedicated Application Pool Dedicated Application Pool Dedicated Application Pool
Support UTF-8 Domains Support UTF-8 Domains Support UTF-8 Domains
30-Days Money Back 30-Days Money Back 30-Days Money Back
Latest ASP.NET Latest ASP.NET Latest ASP.NET
Plesk Control Panel Plesk Control Panel Plesk Control Panel
Windows 2008/2012 Windows 2008/2012 Windows 2008/2012
SQL Server 2008/2012/2014 SQL Server 2008/2012/2014 SQL Server 2008/2012/2014
Latest MySql version Latest MySql version Latest MySql version

How to Choose Cheap ASP.NET Core 6.0.2 Hosting Recommendation

Reliability and Speed of Access

Not only should the web host be reliable and fast, it should guarantee its uptime (the time when it is functional). Look for a minimum uptime of 99%. In fact, even 99% is actually too low — it really should be 99.5% or higher. The host should provide some sort of refund (eg prorated refund or discount) if it falls below that figure. Note though that guarantees are often hard to enforce from your end — especially if the host denies there was any downtime. However, without that guarantee, the web host will have little incentive to ensure that its servers are running all the time.

Data Transfer (Traffic/Bandwidth)

Data transfer (sometimes loosely referred to as “traffic” or “bandwidth”) is the amount of bytes transferred from your site to visitors when they browse your site.

Don’t believe any commercial web host that advertises “unlimited bandwidth”. The host has to pay for the bandwidth, and if you consume a lot of it, they will not silently bear your costs. Many high bandwidth websites have found this out the hard way when they suddenly receive an exorbitant bill for having “exceeded” the “unlimited bandwidth”. Always look for details on how much traffic the package allows. I personally always stay clear of any host that advertises “unlimited transfer”, even if the exact amount is specified somewhere else (sometimes buried in their policy statements). Usually you will find that they redefine “unlimited” to be limited in some way.

In addition, while bandwidth provided is something you should always check, do not be unduly swayed by promises of incredibly huge amounts of bandwidth. Chances are that your website will never be able to use that amount because it will hit other limits, namely resource limits.

To give you a rough idea of the typical traffic requirements of a website, most new sites that don’t provide video or music on their site use less than 3 GB of bandwidth per month. Your traffic requirements will grow over time, as your site becomes more well-known, so you will need to also check their policy when you exceed your data transfer limit: is there a published charge per GB over the allowed bandwidth? Is the charge made according to actual usage or are you expected to pre-pay for a potential overage? It is better not to go for hosts that expect you to prepay for overages, since it is very hard to forsee when your site will exceed its bandwidth and by how much.

Disk space

For the same reason as bandwidth, watch out also for those “unlimited disk space” schemes. Many new sites (that don’t host videos or music) need less than 20 MB of web space, so even if you are provided with a host that tempts you with 100 GB (or “unlimited space”), be aware that you are unlikely to use that space, so don’t let the 100 GB space be too big a factor in your consideration when comparing with other web hosts. The hosting company is also aware of that, which is why they feel free to offer you that as a means of enticing you to host there.

Technical support

Does its technical support function 24 hours a day, 7 days a week (often abbreviated 24/7), all year around? Note that I will not accept a host which does not have staff working on weekends or public holidays. You will be surprised at how often things go wrong at the most inconvenient of times. Incidentally, just because a host advertises that it has 24/7 support does not necessarily mean that it really has that kind of support. Test them out by emailing at midnight and on Saturday nights, Sunday mornings, etc. Check out how long they take to respond. Besides speed of responses, check to see if they are technically competent. You wouldn’t want to sign up with a host that is run by a bunch of salesmen who only know how to sell and not fix problems.

Email, Autoresponders, POP3, Mail Forwarding

If you have your own site, you will probably want to have email addresses at your own domain, like, etc. Does the host allow you to set up whatever email addresses you want on your domain, so that mail can be forwarded to your current email address, or placed into a mail box on your web hosting account itself? Can you set an email address to automatically reply to the sender with a preset message (called an autoresponder)? Can you retrieve your mail with your email software?

Control Panel

This is called various names by different hosts, but essentially, they all allow you to manage different aspects of your web account yourself. Typically, and at the very minimum, it should allow you to do things like add, delete, and manage your email addresses, and change passwords for your account. I will not sign up with a host where I have to go through their technical support each time I want to change a password or add/delete an email account. Such tasks are common maintenance chores that every webmaster performs time and time again, and it would be a great hassle if you had to wait for their technical support to make the changes for you.

Web Server and Operating System

Is the type of operating system and server important?

In general, most people will want to sign up for a web host offering a Unix-based system (like Linux, FreeBSD or OpenBSD) and running the Apache web server. Most web-based software assume your website is running on such a system, and you will usually experience fewer compatibility issues with it. There are also a lot of guides available on the Internet on configuring such systems, so finding help when you need it is easier as well.

In my opinion, the only time when you will want to use a Windows server is if you’re running Windows-specific programs, like ASP scripts. But even then, you’ll probably be better off looking for a PHP-equivalent, and using a Unix-based system.


I was actually hesitant to list this, but I guess it’s futile not to. However, I would caution that while price is always a factor, you should realise (“realize” in US English) that you often get what you pay for, although it’s not necessarily true that the most expensive hosts are the best.

Monthly/Quarterly/Annual Payment Plans

Most web hosts allow you to select an annual payment plan that gives you a cheaper rate than if you were to pay monthly. My current personal preference is to pay monthly with all new web hosts until I’m assured of their reliability and honesty. Paying monthly allows me to switch web hosts quickly when I find that the current host does not meet my requirements: this way, I’m not tied down to a bad web host because I have prepaid for an entire year. I do this even if the new web host guarantees that they will refund the balance if I’m dissatisfied, since at the point I sign up, I have no assurance that they will honour their guarantee. Later (usually after a couple of years), when I’m satisfied with the host, I may change payment plans to the discounted annual plans.


Not all hosting companies own or lease their own web servers. Some of them are actually resellers for some other hosting company. The disadvantage of using a reseller is the possibility that you are dealing with people who don’t know much about the system they are selling and who take longer to help you (they have to transmit your technical support request to the actual hosting company for it to be acted upon). However, this also depends on both the reseller and the underlying hosting company. It is thus wise not to rule out all resellers; there are a number of reliable and fast ones who are actually quite good and cheap. In fact, a number of resellers sell the same packages cheaper than their original hosting company. If you find out that a particular company is a reseller, you will need to investigate both the reseller and the real hosting company.


If you don’t stay in the USA, you have the option of hosting your site with some local provider. The advantage here is the ease of dealing with them (they are after all easily accessible by phone call or a visit), your familiarity with the local laws and easy recourse to those laws should it be necessary. It should be your choice if your target audience is local (eg a local fast food delivery service). On the other hand, hosting it in USA has the advantage of faster access for what is probably the largest number of your overseas visitors (particularly if you have an English-speaking audience). You also have a large number of hosting companies to choose from, and as a result, cheaper prices too.

0 %
0 %
0 %
0 %
0 %
0 %
Rate this post
error: Content is protected !!